Supplier B
Base quote
- Best-sized viable option for limiting initial cash and inventory exposure.
- Smallest estimated inventory cash commitment.
- Fewest estimated months to recover the initial inventory cash.
Interactive example
This isolated example uses the real Section 20 fixture and the same deterministic engines as the project workspace.
Sample data · Section 20 fixture
Explore the validated example without changing projects saved in your browser.
Temporary presets never change the built-in fixture.
Base assumptions active.
Decision status
Confirm the before-deposit checklist, negotiate any flagged terms, then place the smallest viable test order.
Balanced recommendation
Supplier B is the best balanced option for an initial order. It requires $4,849.00 less inventory cash than Supplier C and gives up 7.50 percentage points of expected margin. Supplier C is more suitable only when demand is already validated and its higher cash and inventory exposure are acceptable.
Different jobs, different winners
SupplyVerdict keeps testing, margin, landed cost, cash, and payback conclusions separate—there is no opaque universal score.
Base quote
Base quote
Key comparison
| Metric | Supplier ABase quoteDecision eligible | Supplier BBase quoteDecision eligible | Supplier CBase quoteDecision eligible |
|---|---|---|---|
| QuoteUnit price | $5.30 | $5.90 | $4.70 |
| Planned quantity | 500 units | 300 units | 1,000 units |
| EconomicsLanded cost / unit | $8.64 | $9.60 | $7.73 |
| Net profit / unit | $4.10 | $3.14 | $5.01 |
| Net margin | 16.42% | 12.56% | 20.06% |
| Break-even ACoS | 28.42% | 24.56% | 32.06% |
| Cash & timeInventory cash required | $4,320.00 | $2,881.00 | $7,730.00 |
| Deposit due | $813.00 | $903.00 | $1,551.00 |
| 30-day launch cash | $4,919.76 | $3,480.76 | $8,329.76 |
| Inventory coverage | 2.50 months | 1.50 months | 5.00 months |
| Capital payback months | 1.70 months | 1.14 months | 3.04 months |
| Production lead time | 20 days | 15 days | 35 days |
| ReadinessQuote completeness | 80%Usable with follow-up | 100%Strong quote coverage | 100%Strong quote coverage |
| Confidence | MediumThe quote is usable, but it does not meet every High-confidence condition. 1 critical confirmation item(s) remain. | HighQuote coverage is strong with no critical missing fields. Estimated order-level costs are no more than 20% of landed inventory cost. Core sales, quantity, price, fee, advertising, and return assumptions are valid. | HighQuote coverage is strong with no critical missing fields. Estimated order-level costs are no more than 20% of landed inventory cost. Core sales, quantity, price, fee, advertising, and return assumptions are valid. |
Value-specific reasoning
Risk control
Critical gaps appear before confirmations and informational terms.
Calculated guardrails
Targets come directly from the existing negotiation engine.
Transparent methodology
merchandise + per-unit extras × quantity + order costs$4,320.00selling price − landed cost − selling costs$4.10planned quantity ÷ expected monthly sales2.50 monthsFreight: provided; duty: provided; delivery: providedEstimated fields lower decision confidence until confirmed.merchandise + per-unit extras × quantity + order costs$2,881.00selling price − landed cost − selling costs$3.14planned quantity ÷ expected monthly sales1.50 monthsFreight: provided; duty: provided; delivery: providedEstimated fields lower decision confidence until confirmed.merchandise + per-unit extras × quantity + order costs$7,730.00selling price − landed cost − selling costs$5.01planned quantity ÷ expected monthly sales5.00 monthsFreight: provided; duty: provided; delivery: providedEstimated fields lower decision confidence until confirmed.SupplyVerdict calculations are deterministic estimates based on entered assumptions. They are not customs, tax, legal, accounting, or demand guarantees.